U.S. Taxation of Foreign Corporations And Nonresident Aliens General Rules
Tax Planning Before Immigrating to the U.S.
Tax Planning for the Foreign Real Estate Investor
The following narrative outline below is intended to provide the foreign investor, both corporate and individual, with a basic introduction to the tax laws of the United States as they apply to that foreign investor.
A General Overview
INTRODUCTION
The United States has long been a safe haven for foreign investors. Now it has become not only a safe haven for foreign investors, it has also become a nation that has myriad real estate and business assets all available for acquisition at bargain prices due to the precipitous fall in the U.S. dollar.
What is not so well known is that the United States tax laws are very favorable to foreign investment; providing at times for the payment of tax free interest by U.S. taxpayers to foreign investors. Capital gains from investment may be tax free or subject to tax rates of 15%, and the complex laws provide for numerous methods of deferring the payment of U.S. taxes to a later point in time.
At the same time, these same laws can become tax traps for the poorly advised investor and can cause income taxes on profits to be as high as 65% and estate (inheritance) taxes to be paid on U.S. assets held at death as high as 48%.
The following narrative outline is intended to provide the foreign investor, both corporate and individual, with only a basic introduction to the tax laws of the United States as they apply to that foreign investor. Hopefully, it will let the foreign investor know that they are welcome in the United States. More importantly, it should help the foreign investor know that the U.S. tax laws are complex and must be dealt with in a highly professional manner; if one is to avoid the tax traps and take advantage of the many tax benefits offered by the United States.
The general principles discussed herein are not intended to be legal or tax advice and taxpayers should consult with their individual legal, accounting, and tax advisors.
VIDEO: (General Overview) United States Taxation of Foreign Investors, total presentation time: 90:00
U.S. Taxation of Foreign Investors Table of Contents
I. TAXATION PATTERN
II. STATUS FOR TAX PURPOSES
III. TWO TYPES OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION PATTERNS
IV. THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TREATIESV. THE BRANCH PROFITS TAX
VI. PRE-IMMIGRATION PLANNING – INCOME TAX AND GAINS
VII. PRE-IMMIGRATION PLANNING – ESTATE AND GIFT TAX
VIII. EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND SPECIAL TAX BENEFITS
IX. REAL ESTATE – TAXATION PATTERN
X. OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPERTY
XI. TAX PLANNING BENEFITS AND TRAPS UNIQUE TO THE FOREIGN INVESTOR IN REAL ESTATE
XII. THE TAX PLANNING STRUCTURES
I. TAXATION PATTERN
United States Resident Alien (“Tax Resident”) – Subject to Taxation
a. Income Taxation – Worldwide Income
b. Estate Taxation – Worldwide Assets
c. Gift Taxation – Worldwide Assets
Non Resident Alien – Subject to Taxation
a. Income Taxation – United States Source Income, Limited type of Foreign Source Income
b. Estate Tax – United States Situs Assets Only
c. Gift Tax – Real and Tangible Personal Property with a United States Situs
There is a vast difference in the manner in which the United States will apply its income, estate and gift taxes to a would-be immigrant that is considered a “tax resident” and one that still has “non-resident alien” status. A tax resident will be subject to U.S. incomes taxes, estate taxes and gift taxes on a worldwide basis. Non-resident aliens will generally only pay U.S. income tax on income earned from U.S. sources and will pay U.S. estate taxes only on real property and tangible personal property in the United States, and selected intangible assets.
II. STATUS FOR TAX PURPOSES
Resident for Income Tax Purposes
a. Green Card
b. Substantial Presence Test
c. Voluntary Election
d. The Closer Connection Exception
e. Treaties: Tie Breaker
Nonresident Alien Individuals – Income Tax
A nonresident alien individual is defined as any citizen of a country other than the United States who is not a “U.S. resident” for U.S. income tax purposes. The general rule is that an alien is not considered to be a U.S. resident for tax purposes if the alien does not have (1) a green card representing permanent residency in the U.S. or (2) a “substantial presence or time period” in the U.S. as described below. There are exceptions to this general rule that will also be discussed.
An alien individual has a “substantial presence” in the United States for the calendar year in which the alien is both physically present in the U.S. for at least 31 days and; in that same calendar year is considered to have been in the U.S. for a combined total of 183 days or more over the past three years pursuant to a formula.
For purposes of calculating this combined 3 year, 183-day requirement; each day present in the United States during the current “combined” calendar year counts as a full day, each day in the preceding year as one-third of a day and each day in the second preceding year as one-sixth of a day. This is shown on the example below.
The United States has tax treaties with many countries. These treaties generally provide that the residents and corporations of each country to the treaty are entitled to a more liberal tax treatment than residents and corporations of non-treaty countries. The concept of residency under the treaties is different than the general definition and may permit a nonresident alien to spend more time in the U.S. each year without being a U.S. tax resident. Generally, the tax treaties will permit the alien individual to remain a non-resident for U.S. tax purposes so long as the alien covered by the treaty stays less than 183 days in the U.S. each separate year: and not over the cumulative three year period.
This same type of treatment, that of permitting aliens to have an extended stay in the U.S. of less than 183 days in each year without becoming a U.S. tax resident, is also available to certain aliens that are not from countries governed by a U.S. tax treaty. If an alien has provable close business and social ties to his or her native country; the substantial presence test is extended due to their “closer connection” to a foreign country than to the U.S.
Foreign Corporation – Income Tax
A foreign corporation is a recognized separate taxpayer for U.S. tax purposes. A foreign corporation for U.S. tax purposes, is a corporation that is not organized under the laws of the United States or any one of the states of the United States. A foreign corporation’s articles of incorporation will reflect whether it is a foreign corporation or a U.S. domestic corporation.
III. TWO TYPES OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION PATTERNS
U.S. Taxpayers (Citizens and Resident Aliens)
As a general rule, U.S. domestic corporations and United States citizens and residents are taxed by the U.S, on their worldwide net income regardless of the source of the income. Exceptions to this rule exist only to prevent “double taxation” of foreign income earned by U.S. individuals and Companies abroad. Double Taxation is prevented by allowing U.S. taxpayers to obtain a credit against their U.S. tax for foreign taxes paid on that same income.
Foreign Taxpayer
Foreign Taxpayers (both alien individuals and foreign corporations), however, pay U.S. tax on U.S. income in two entirely different ways depending upon whether the income the Foreign Taxpayer earns is from “passive” sources or whether the income results from the Foreign Taxpayer’s conduct of an active trade or business in the U.S.
Furthermore, the U.S. tax rules for Foreign Taxpayers take into account the fact that the jurisdiction of the United States can extend just so far. Therefore, as a general rule a Foreign Taxpayer will only pay U.S. tax on their “U.S. Source Income” and not on income earned from outside of the United States. There are however exceptions.
n order to understand the two different types of taxation, it is important to examine the general rules that define whether a Foreign Taxpayer is conducting an “active business in the U.S.” or a “passive investment” as well as the rules governing “source of income” and the “source of deductions”. These definitions determine which one of the two sets of tax rules must be applied in order to calculate the U.S. tax liability of foreign corporations and nonresident alien investors.
Source of Income Rules
a. U.S. Source Income
b. Foreign Source Income
c. Deductions
There are a strict set of rules that govern the determination of whether income finds its source in the United States or a foreign place for U.S. tax purposes.
They are as follows:
Compensation for personal services. The source of income from the performance of personal services is located at the place where the services are performed.
Rents and royalties. Rent or royalty income has its source at the location, or place of use, of the leased or licensed property.
Real Property Income and Gain. Income and gain from the rental or sale of real estate has its source at the place where the property is situated.
Sale of personal property. Historically, gain from the sale of personal property has been sourced at the “place of sale” which is generally held to be the place where title to the goods passes; however the rules have become more complex taking other factors in place.
Interest. The source of interest income is generally determined by reference to the residence of the debtor; interest paid by a resident of the United States constitutes U.S. source income, while interest paid by foreign residents is generally foreign-source income.
Dividends. The source of dividend income generally depends on the nationality or place of incorporation of the corporate payor; that is, distributions by U.S. corporations constitute domestic-source income, while dividends of foreign corporations are foreign-source income. There are, however, several important exceptions to these rules.
Partially Within and Partially Without. There is a set of source rules that consider the sources of income that can be partially earned in the U.S. and partially from foreign sources such as income from transportation services rendered partly within and partly without the United States; income from the sale of inventory property “produced”, “created”, “fabricated”, “manufactured”, “extracted”, “preserved”, “cured”, or “aged” without and sold within the United States or vice versa, and several other types of income. Generally, this is done on some type of allocation basis between the source countries.
Source of Deductions
The source rules for deductions are considerably less specific than those dealing with gross income. The rules regarding claiming deductions against U.S. income earned by a Foreign Taxpayer merely provide that taxable income from domestic or foreign sources is to be determined by properly apportioning or allocating expenses, losses, and other deductions to the items of gross income to which they relate.
Taxation of Passive (Non Business Income)
a. 30% Flat Tax Rate – Gross Income
b. Withholding obligations
The Taxation of Passive Income
If the income that a Foreign Taxpayer earns is passive in nature and does not result from the Foreign Taxpayer conducting an ongoing “trade or business”; the Foreign Taxpayer’s U.S.-source investment income is taxed at a flat 30 percent rate (with no deductions). Generally, the passive types of income earned by investors are such things as interest, dividends, royalties and other periodic payments that arise from the licensing of trademarks, goodwill and numerous types of intellectual property. Foreign Investors that earn only passive U.S. income are also generally not subject to tax on capital gains and other nonrecurring U.S.-source income.
Since as a general rule Foreign Taxpayers earning passive income in the U.S. have only limited ties to the U.S.; a tax “withholding system” is in place. This system essentially forces the U.S. person that is paying the passive income to a Foreign Taxpayer to collect the tax that is due and pay it to the United States. Failure to do so can result in the U.S. person that is responsible to withhold this tax being personally responsible for the tax.
Taxation of Active Trade or Business Income
a. Graduated Corporate Tax Rates
b. Graduated Individual Tax Rates
c. Effectively Connected Income
Of central importance to the U.S. taxation of Foreign Taxpayers is whether the foreign persons are engaged in a trade or business and, if so, whether the trade or business is located within the United States. Foreign Taxpayers engaged in a trade or business are taxed on their U.S. source income in the same manner as U.S. citizens, tax residents and domestic corporations. That is they are taxed on their taxable U.S. source income after allowable deductions at graduated tax rates.
Whether the Foreign Taxpayer is considered to be engaged in a trade or business within the United States depends on the nature and extent of the taxpayer’s economic contacts with the United States. It is clear that the entire business operation need not be centered in the United States.
The difficult question is, how much of the business functions must be located in the United States in order to create a U.S. trade situs?
A fully integrated enterprise that manufactures and sells its total output in the United States, and is managed and controlled in the United States, is clearly a U.S. trade or business.
At the other end of the spectrum, is the wholly foreign enterprise that merely ships products to customers in the United States, but has no other economic contact with the United States engaged in a U.S. trade or business. Between these two extremes, however, the presence of a U.S. business situs has to be determined on a case-by-case basis, to identify the point at which mere business with the United States crosses the line and becomes business within the United States.
As a general rule, the more deeply a foreign corporation becomes enmeshed in the economic and commercial structure of the United States, the more likely it will be found to have established a trade or business in the United States.
Income Effectively Connected with a U.S. Business
Unlike a Foreign Taxpayer that is taxed on passive U.S. source income only; income of a Foreign Taxpayer that conducts a trade or business in the U.S. will pay tax on all of its United States source income and in limited circumstances, U.S. tax must be paid on income that is earned from foreign sources and not U.S. sources. Foreign source income that is attributable to a Foreign Taxpayer’s U.S. trade or business activity maybe taxed by the U.S. and is called “Effective Connected Income”.
Whether non-U.S. source income earned by a Foreign Taxpayer is taxed as “trade or business” income is determined by how closely the income is attributed to the Foreign Taxpayer’s U.S. trade or business.
In addition to certain foreign source income being subject to U.S. tax; U.S. passive source income may be taxed like trade or business income, if it is considered to be “effectively connected income.”
It is possible that at times, U.S. source passive type income will be subject to a tax on net income and not the usual 30% tax that is applied to gross income. For example, though interest income is normally considered “passive income”; it is “active business income” to a Foreign bank that holds deposits and conducts business in the U.S. Therefore, interest earned on such deposits would not be taxed at a flat rate. Rather it is taxed on a progressive rate that permits offsetting deductions for the foreign bank’s cost of funds and other costs of doing business in the U.S.
IV. THE EFFECT OF BILATERAL TREATIES
Bilateral Tax Treaties
The role of bilateral tax treaties in the taxation of Foreign Taxpayers on their U.S. source income is frequently of even greater importance than the basic statutory general rules just mentioned. Tax treaties between the U.S. and other countries can operate to (1) reduce (or even eliminate) the rate of U.S. tax on certain types of U.S. income derived by Foreign Taxpayers situated in the treaty-partner country; (2) override various statutory source of income rules (3) exempt certain types of income or activities from taxation, by one or both treaty-partner countries; and (4) extend credit for taxes levied by one country to situations where the domestic law would not so provide.
The principal purpose of the U.S. bilateral tax treaties is to avoid the potential for double taxation arising from overlapping tax jurisdictions (e.g. income source arising in one country while the taxpayer is resident in the other country.)
V. THE BRANCH PROFITS TAX
The Branch Profits Tax
There is an additional tax that foreign corporations must be aware of. This is a major trap for the unwary. Absent the tax benefits of an applicable United States tax treaty; a Foreign Corporation may be subject to not only the combined Florida and Federal income tax approaching 40%; but depending upon the facts and circumstances, foreign corporations with earnings from United States investments could be subject to an additional United States tax known as the Branch Profits Tax. The 30% tax is applied to U.S. income that is either not distributed as a dividend or reinvested in U.S. assets by the Foreign Corporation. Tax Planning Before Immigrating to the U.S.Safeguarding The Immigrant’s Financial Interests Prior to Tax Residency
VI. PRE-IMMIGRATION PLANNING – INCOME TAX AND GAINS
Objective – Minimize United States Gains and Income Tax
a. A nonresident alien, prior to becoming a U.S. tax resident will want to make sure that he or she does not have to pay a U.S. tax on money that as a practical matter, was earned before their residency period. A key strategy therefore, is to accelerate gains prior to residency so that gains earned while one was a nonresident alien are not subject to U.S. tax after residency is obtained. An example of acceleration would be to trade securities with unrealized gain and sell them before residency. There would be no tax on the gain and the shares can be repurchased with a new high cost basis.
Assume a nonresident alien owned $1.0 million dollars worth of shares of Ford Motor Company that was purchased for $100,000. If the shares are sold after U.S. tax residency is assumed, there will be a tax on $900,000 in gains. A sale of these same shares by a Nonresident before obtaining U.S. income tax residency would result in no taxable gain.
b. Another key strategy is to accelerate income that is expected to be paid after residency. Payments should be collected prior to residency. Examples of income acceleration:
Exercise stock options
Accelerate taxable distributions from deferred compensation plans
Accelerate gains on Notes held from installment sales
c. One can also defer recognizing a loss until after obtaining residency so that it can be used against post residency gain. Assets with a fair market value below cost can be sold after residency.
VII. Pre Immigration Planning – Estate and Gift Tax
Residency for Estate and Gift Tax PurposesA nonresident alien individual can be subject to the United States estate and gift taxes. However, nonresident aliens are subject to U.S. estate and gift taxes only on assets situated in the U.S.
The definition of nonresidency for estate and gift tax purposes is completely different than the definition of residency for income tax purposes. A nonresident alien for estate and gift tax purposes is an individual whose “domicile” is in a country other than the U.S. Domicile is a subjective test based on one’s intent of permanency in a country. Objective-Minimize United States Estate Tax
a. Key strategy is to minimize assets in one’s estate before obtaining residency status; and where possible to retain some degree of control over assets.
b. Planned gifts to third parties should be made prior to residency.
c. Planned gifts of United States Situs Property
Tangible Property – Physical Change of Situs to a Foreign Situs Before Gift is made.
Real Estate – Contribution to foreign corporation and gift of stock in foreign corporation.
d. Transfers in Trust for Beneficiaries
VIII. EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND SPECIAL TAX BENEFITS
Students
a. A foreign student who has obtained the proper immigration status will be exempt from being treated as a U.S. resident for U.S. tax purposes even if he or she is here for a substantial time period that would ordinarily result in the student being taxed as a U.S. resident.
b. This student visa not only permits the student to study in the United States but to pay taxes only on income from U.S. sources not worldwide income. The visa also permits the student’s direct relatives to accompany the student to the United States and receive the same tax benefits.
c. Assume the student, a South American woman aged 40, is married to an extremely successful South American businessman who accompanies her with their two children to the U.S. His annual income is $1.0 Million and is earned from the banking business in Columbia. He earns no U.S. income. Under those circumstances, for U.S. income tax purposes, this businessman is exempt from U.S. tax on his worldwide income while living full-time in the U.S. for less than five calendar years.
Treaty Benefits
a. Aliens that are governed by a tax treaty can generally spend more time in the U.S. than an alien not covered by a treaty before being considered a resident alien for tax purposes.
TAX PLANNING FOR THE FOREIGN REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
Tax Benefits and Tax Traps
IX. Real Estate – TAXATION PATTERN
U.S. Taxpayers
U.S. Citizens, Resident Aliens and Domestic Corporations Real Estate Income Subject to Taxation
a. Income Taxation – Worldwide Income
b. Estate and Gift Taxation (Individuals only) – Worldwide Assets
Foreign Taxpayers
Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporations Real Estate Income Subject to Taxation
a. Income Taxation – United States Real Estate Income
Generally taxed on net income similar to US Taxpayers
Several Important Exceptions
b. Capital Gains Taxation Alien Individual – Individual Tax Rates Foreign Corporation – Corporate Tax Rates
c. Estate Taxation Alien Individual Residency for Estate Tax Purposes U.S. Real Property, U.S companies holding U.S. Real Property and the U.S. estate and gift taxes
d. The Branch Profits Tax (Foreign Corporation Only)
Income Tax
Income derived by a Foreign Taxpayer from United States real estate has its own unique taxation pattern that is different in many instances from other types of income earned by the Foreign Taxpayer. A Foreign Taxpayer will generally pay income tax like a United States investor on its real estate income and the Foreign Taxpayer will pay tax on capital gains derived from a sale of United States real property like the U.S. taxpayer.
Capital Gains
Like the U.S. taxpayer, in the event of real estate capital gains, there is a distinct benefit between capital gains earned by a nonresident alien individual who will be taxed at the lower long-term capital gains rate of 15%, and the capital gains earned by a foreign corporation that might carry a Florida state and Federal income tax on the same gain approaching 40%.
Estate/Gift Taxes
A nonresident alien individual can be subject to the United States estate and gift taxes. However, non- resident aliens are subject to U.S. estate and gift taxes only on assets situated in the U.S. U.S. real estate is one of the items that is subject to U.S. estate and gift taxes.
The Branch Tax
There is an additional tax that foreign corporations must be aware of. This is a major trap for the unwary. Subject to the provision of a potentially applicable United States tax treaty; a foreign corporation may be subject to not only the combined Florida and Federal income tax approaching 40%. Foreign corporations with earnings from United States real property investments could be subject the additional United States Branch Tax of 30%.
X. OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPERTY
How Should the Foreign Investor Hold U.S. Property – Alien Individual Ownership, Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies and Foreign and Domestic Corporations
a. Capital Gains Benefits
b. Ordinary Income Taxes
c. Estate Tax Burdens
An alien individual may conduct his or her real estate business in the United States as an individual owner of real property, as a partner in a partnership, as a member of a limited liability company or as a shareholder of a corporation either foreign or domestic.
Individual Ownership and Ownership by Pass Through Entities
Individual ownership or the use of a limited partnership or limited liability company does generally provide the best income tax results. This is because both partnerships and most (but not all) limited liability companies (“Pass Through Entities”) pass all of their U.S. tax attributes to their individual owners directly;as if the entity does not exist for tax purposes. The long-term capital gains rate for a nonresident alien individual will be at a maximum of 15%.
Individual or pass through entity ownership has its income tax benefits but has several drawbacks. The conduct of the real estate business through anything other than the typical corporation will not accomplish the goal of Foreign Investor anonymity.
Ownership individually or through Pass Through Entities require the Foreign Taxpayer Owner to file a U.S. tax return. Furthermore, a nonresident alien’s individual ownership or pass through ownership of U.S. real property will also most likely subject the nonresident alien to a U.S. estate tax on the equity value of the real property. The individual Foreign Taxpayer may at times be forced to trade off the income tax benefit versus these other exposures.
Corporate Ownership
The ordinary income rates and capital gain rates of a corporation are the same. Therefore, both ordinary income and capital gain earned by a corporation can be subject to a U.S. and individual state tax rate approaching 40%; as compared to the 15% capital gain rate paid by a nonresident individual owner.
Furthermore, the payment of dividends by a corporation to its nonresident shareholder might be subject to an additional U.S. withholding tax on dividends. However, ownership of U.S. real property through the corporate form will insure that individual tax returns do not need to be filed by the individual Foreign Investor.
Often with proper tax planning, the tax barriers of corporate ownership of real estate can be significantly reduced.
XI. TAX PLANNING BENEFITS AND TRAPS UNIQUE TO THE FOREIGN INVESTOR IN REAL ESTATE
Tax Treaties Liquidation of Corporation
a. The Problems of Double Taxation
b. Foreign Investors – Payment of a Single U.S. tax Portfolio Interest
a. Tax Free U.S. Income
b. U.S. Interest Deductible
c. The Restrictions on Portfolio Interest
d. Planning Techniques Sale of Foreign Corporate Stock
a. Tax Benefits
b. Practical Applications
Once the form of ownership is determined there are several additional planning tools that may be specifically helpful to the Foreign Taxpayer.
Tax Treaties
As mentioned previously, a primary planning tool available to certain Foreign Taxpayer is their ability to rely on a United States tax treaty that may exist with the Foreign Taxpayer’s host country. This type of tax treaty will assure that there is no double taxation between the two countries.
Income will only be taxed at the maximum highest rate of both countries. Treaties may also provide for the prevention of double taxation under the estate tax laws of the two countries, reduce or eliminate the Branch Tax and generally reduce United States taxes on the Foreign Investor’s interest, dividends and business income that are earned from U.S. sources.
A Single U.S. Tax
Even without treaty benefits, Foreign Taxpayers investing in the United States in corporate form can ensure that there will be no dividend or Branch tax on income earned from United States real property by a corporation.
So long as a corporate entity sells or distributes all of its real estate assets and pays a U.S. corporate tax on gain; it may be timely liquidated and distribute all of the sales proceeds free of any further tax. This can avoid a second U.S. tax by the Foreign Taxpayer since the distributions from the Corporation that are liquidation proceeds and not dividends, are excluded from further U.S. taxes.
Portfolio Interest
Another planning tool permits Foreign Taxpayers, both corporate and individual, to benefit from the fact that they are permitted to earn tax-free interest income on certain loans to support U.S. real estate investments. By taking advantage of and meeting the requirements of the “portfolio interest rules”, the Foreign Taxpayer may earn tax-free interest instead of taxable real estate profits or dividends.
Sale of Stock/Foreign Corporation
U.S. taxes on real estate profits can be totally eliminated in rare occasions in which a real estate buyer is willing to acquire a Foreign Taxpayer’s shares in a foreign corporation that owns U.S. real estate. A Foreign Taxpayer may form a foreign corporation to own United States real estate. Gain from the sale of shares of stock in that foreign corporation by the Foreign Taxpayer generally is not subject to tax; even if the foreign corporation owns U.S. real estate. Due to its many complexities, this technique is applicable only in very limited situations and is not considered to any degree in this outline.
XII. THE TAX PLANNING STRUCTURES
Specific Tax Planning Entities for Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporate Real Estate Investors
Objective – Minimize U.S. Income Tax, Capital Gains and Estate Tax on Real Estate Profits. It is important to note that income tax planning and estate and gift tax planning are often at cross purposes.
The Structure – Individual or Partnership or Limited Liability Company Ownership
a. Income Tax
b. Capital Gains Tax
c. Estate Tax The Structure – Foreign Corporation Ownership
a. Income Tax
b. Estate Tax
c. Branch Tax The Structure – A Foreign Holding Company and a U.S. Subsidiary
a. Income Tax
b. Estate Tax
c. Branch Tax
To take advantage of any of the several unique tax benefits and avoid the traps, the Taxpayer Investor must find the proper investment vehicle that meets the Foreign Taxpayer’s tax needs and his or her other personal and commercial needs. Each Foreign Taxpayer will find that their tax structure will be unique to them and the various tax planning techniques fit in some situations and not others.
There are three very basic structures that will show the different types of tax considerations depending upon the nature of the real estate. A chart of the three structures and their tax attributes may be found following this discussion. The cost factor of any tax planning structure must be considered in advance. Generally, a transaction should be of a certain significant size to benefit from the more complex structures.
Individual Ownership/Pass Through Entity
Individual ownership of real property by a nonresident alien or ownership through a Pass Through Entity results in the nonresident alien being required to file a U.S. tax return and most likely subjects him or her to estate taxes on the real property. However, it is the best vehicle for income tax purposes.
Foreign Corporate Ownership
A Foreign Taxpayer investing in passive real estate (that is not income producing, such as raw land) who wishes to avoid estate taxes and preserve anonymity might use a single foreign corporation to own the real estate.
The Foreign Taxpayer should know that the capital gains earned by the foreign corporation from the sale of the real estate could be significantly higher than individual ownership. Since there is no annual income from passive real estate holdings, the Branch Tax can be avoided by the liquidation of the foreign corporation after the sale of the foreign corporation’s real estate.
Real Estate Holding Company
A Foreign Taxpayer involved in the active real estate business, such as ownership of income producing property or development property, may as a general rule, invest in the following fashion. The Foreign Taxpayer will form a foreign holding corporation that then is the 100% owner of a domestic corporation such as a Florida corporation. The Florida corporation is the direct real estate owner.
This structure can eliminate at least two of the three taxes that the Foreign Taxpayer might face. Since the direct investor in the real estate is a domestic corporation, it need not pay any Branch tax on its profits. Since the Foreign Investor owns only shares in a foreign corporation, there is no estate tax upon his or her demise. The income tax, however, is generally unfavorable as compared to individual ownership.
